• New Ruling, New Voters

    Our second Pop and Politics special, set in Arizona, deals with, among other things, the diverse and growing Latino voting population and younger voters… both part of a broad look at how the American electorate is changing. And courts are clarifying a crucial voting law. From Politico.com.

    A six-year-old Arizona law requiring that voters prove their citizenship in order to register to vote was struck down Tuesday. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the portion of the law requiring that voters present identification before casting their ballot, part of a proposition passed in 2004 amid concerns that illegal immigrants may try to vote in state and federal elections.

    Continue Reading…

  • “The Border Will Always Be Porous”

    When Arizona governor Jan Brewer signed SB-1070, a bill that required local police officers to enforce federal immigration law, Arizona became the flash point for a national debate about how best to deal with illegal immigration. On July 28th, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton blocked key provision of the law from taking effect. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit Court in San Francisco is set to hear oral arguments on Monday in a case brought by the U.S. Justice Department against Arizona.

    The number of immigrants arrested for illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border has steadily declined from over 600,000 people a year in 2000, to around 200,000 this year, a drop in 17% from last year. In spite of the decline, the issue of illegal immigration loomed large as the Pop and Politics team arrived in Phoenix in late September. Our first stop: a jail in the desert outside of Phoenix.

  • Politics and Population Density: Not Quite Arizona

    Our team returned this weekend to New York (left) , a city with, to say the least, a high population density. Similar sky, but not quite Arizona (right).

    One of the more thoughtful articles I’ve read recently about America’s differences in attitude and governance touched on population density as a key determinant of attitudes toward Federal powers. Kathleen Parker (now known to many as Eliot Spitzer’s co-host on CNN), wrote:

    As Barack Obama told us at the Democratic convention in 2004, we are not a red and blue nation, etc., etc., etc. True enough, but we are a high-density/low-density nation.

    She continues:

    As a smallish-town girl come to the humongous city, I am all too aware of the appeal and horror of centralized government. Simply put, the more people cram themselves into small spaces, the more government will be involved in their lives….

    If you live in a large urban area, chances are you are accustomed to lots of rules and regs. But to the newcomer, fresh from living largely independently by her own wits, the oppression of bureaucratic order is a fresh sort of hell.That sounds good on the surface, but as we found out in Arizona, there is a river of Federal money flowing into the state, mainly for military and law-enforcement. And with that, particularly with border enforcement, comes a constant insertion of Federal powers into peoples’ daily lives. Be prepared to stop, pull over, and show ID at all times. (We were.) Whether that is good or bad is precisely the crux of the debate over Arizona’s controversial immigration law S.B. 1070 and other laws or bills.

    I would love to know your thoughts on how you perceive the Federal government’s influence in your specific community. How does law enforcement affect you, your family, and neighbors?

    For bonus points, I’m intrigued by this demographic trend, which Fox calls “reverse white flight”… more of the Paris model of city v. suburb perhaps? Our first radio special, airing October 21, will definitely touch on this and gentrification.